Table of Contents

guest
2025-04-20
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table 5

Table 1


Table 1. Study Results. Shown is the ratio of tryptic (L) to isotope-labeled peptide (H) for all participants included in Study 1 (AD N = 7 and controls N = 10), Study 2 (AD N = 12 and controls N = 14), Study 3 (AD N = 6, PD N = 10, prodromal AD N = 10 and stable MCI N = 15) and Study 4 (AD N = 36, PD N = 11 and controls N = 44).




Table 2


Table 2. Proteins and peptides targeted using a combination of SPE and PRM-MS. Shown are the proteins and peptides targeted and information on the stable isotope labeled peptides used, methodological information and methodological performance.




Table 3


Table 3. Calibration Curve Peptide Concentrations. Shown is the concentration of stable isotope-labeled peptides and proteins in a serially diluted mixture. After serial dilution an equal concentration of bovine serum albumin was added to each calibration point. No bovine serum albumin was added to calibration point 4 which therefore was excluded.




Table 4


Table 4. Calibration Curve Data. The data show the area ratio of stable isotope-labeled peptide to tryptic peptide (H/L) from reverse calibration curves. In three experiments, duplicate curves were prepared by spiking dilution mixtures into a QC CSF sample. Six calibration points (1-3 and 5-7) and a blank (0), only containing bovine serum albumin protein, were analyzed.




Table 5


Table 5. Precision Data. Eight QC CSF replicate samples were prepared and analyzed on five separate occasions. The table show the area ratio of tryptic to isotope-labeled heavy peptide (L/H) for each replicate and experiment.